An immigration bond hearing is a proceeding in immigration court where a judge decides whether a person who has been detained by ICE can be released while their immigration case proceeds, and if so, how much the bond will be. If someone you love was just detained, a bond hearing is likely the most urgent thing on your list right now. Here is how it works and what matters. I handle detention and bond cases at my office in Fort Worth. The calls I get from families when someone is detained are almost always the same: they do not know where the person is, they do not know what the process is, and they do not know how to help. This is what you need to know. How ICE detention works When ICE detains someone in North Texas, they’re usually processed first at the Dallas ICE Field Office and then moved to a detention center. The closest is the Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, about 40 miles south of Dallas. Other facilities under the Dallas Field Office are much farther west: the Bluebonnet Detention Facility in Anson (about 200 miles from Dallas), the Rolling Plains Detention Center in Haskell, and the Eden Detention Center in Eden. Depending on bed space, people may also be sent to facilities elsewhere in Texas, such as the T. Don Hutto center in Taylor near Austin or the South Texas ICE Processing Center in Pearsall south of San Antonio, or out of state to Louisiana and beyond. Parents detained with their children are typically held at the Dilley Immigration Processing Center in South Texas, the country’s only family detention center. Transfers often happen with little notice and can put people hundreds of miles from home, which makes it much harder for families and lawyers to stay in contact. ICE has authority to detain someone it believes is in the country unlawfully, someone in removal proceedings, or someone it considers a flight risk or a danger to the community. Not everyone who is detained has the same legal situation — some people are subject to mandatory detention under immigration law because of certain criminal convictions, and those individuals cannot be released on bond regardless of what a judge decides. What a bond hearing is and how to request one A bond hearing is a separate proceeding from the removal case itself. It is focused specifically on whether the detained person should be released and at what bond amount. To request a bond hearing, the detained person or their attorney files a request with the immigration court. There is no automatic bond hearing — you have to ask for one. Immigration judges look at two main things in a bond hearing: whether the person is a danger to the community and whether they are a flight risk. For the danger question, any criminal history is relevant. For the flight risk question, judges look at community ties — how long the person has been in the area, whether they have family here, whether they have stable employment, whether they have a history of compliance with prior court dates. Strong community ties — a spouse, children, a home, years of employment, no prior removal history, no criminal record — tend to support a lower bond amount or release on supervision. A prior removal order, a criminal record, or a pattern of not appearing for court dates makes the bond argument harder. What bond amounts look like Immigration bonds are typically set between $1,500 and $25,000, though they can go higher in cases involving criminal history or prior removals. The bond amount has to be paid to ICE before the person is released. Immigration bonds work through immigration bond companies that charge a non-refundable fee, usually around 15 to 20 percent of the total bond amount. If the bond is paid and the person is released, they still have an immigration case pending. Release on bond does not resolve the underlying case. It just means the person can be home while the case is handled in court rather than detained throughout the process. If a judge sets the bond too high If a judge sets a bond amount that the family cannot pay, the decision can be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals. An appeal takes time and the detained person remains in custody during the appeal, so it is a calculation that has to be made carefully. In some cases it makes more sense to pay a high bond and fight the underlying case from home rather than appeal the bond amount. Mandatory detention — when a bond hearing may not help Some people in immigration detention are subject to mandatory detention under federal law. This includes people with certain criminal convictions — aggravated felonies, drug offenses above a certain level, crimes of violence. If someone falls into a mandatory detention category, a judge cannot set a bond. The legal fight in that situation is about the underlying removal case or about challenging whether mandatory detention applies. This is one of the first things I assess when a family calls me about a detained loved one. Whether a bond hearing is possible — and how strong the bond arguments are — depends on the person's immigration history and criminal record. Getting that analysis right early saves a lot of time and money. What to do right now if someone you know was detained Call an immigration attorney as quickly as possible. The first 24 to 48 hours matter because the detained person needs to understand their rights, needs to know not to sign any voluntary departure or removal paperwork without legal advice, and because locating the person in the detention system takes time. ICE has an online detainee locator tool but it is not always current. Do not panic. Detention is not the end of the case. People fight their immigration cases from detention and win. People are released on bond and fight their cases from home. The outcome depends on the facts of the case and the quality of the representation. If someone you know was detained in Fort Worth, Dallas, or anywhere in the DFW area, even nationwide, call us immediately. We will locate them, assess whether a bond hearing is available, and tell you honestly what the options are. Attorney Arzoo Connor ARC Legal Services | Fort Worth, TX | Hablamos Español 469-200-0158 | arclawoffice.com This post is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Every immigration case is different. Please consult a qualified attorney about your individual situation.

An inadmissibility waiver is a formal legal request asking the government to overlook a specific ground that would otherwise bar you from obtaining a visa or green card.

Whether you can get a green card after entering the United States without inspection depends on several factors — whether you have a qualifying family member, how long you have been here, whether you have any prior removal orders, and your specific immigration history. There is no single yes or no answer. But there are paths that exist for some people in this situation, and there are specific reasons why others cannot use them, and understanding which category you are in is the most important thing you can do right now. This is the question I hear most in my office in Fort Worth. People who have been here for ten, fifteen, twenty years. People who have US citizen children, US citizen spouses. People who built lives here and want to know whether there is a legal path forward. Here is the honest answer. What 'entered without inspection' means and why it matters Entering without inspection means crossing into the United States without going through an official port of entry or without being admitted by an immigration officer. No visa. No stamp. Just crossing. This matters for green card purposes because the standard path to a green card — called adjustment of status — generally requires that you were inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States. If you entered without inspection, you were not admitted. That creates a barrier to adjusting status inside the country that people who entered with a visa and overstayed do not face in the same way. When a path to a green card may exist despite entering without inspection The most common situation where a path exists is through a provision called 245(i). This is a law that allows certain people who entered without inspection — or who have other technical bars to adjustment of status — to still apply for a green card inside the United States, as long as they had a family petition or labor certification filed on their behalf before April 30, 2001, and they pay a penalty fee. If you have a family member who filed for you before that date, this may apply to you. The date cutoff is firm and there is no exception to it. Another situation is parole in place for military families. If you are an immediate family member — spouse, child, or parent — of someone on active duty in the US military or a veteran, you may be eligible for parole in place, which gives you a form of admission that then allows you to apply for adjustment of status. This is a specific and limited exception, but it is a real one. There is also consular processing — leaving the United States and applying for an immigrant visa at a US consulate abroad. This is sometimes an option, but it requires understanding the unlawful presence bars before you go. If you have been in the United States unlawfully for more than 180 days and you leave, you trigger a bar on returning. More than one year unlawfully, and it is a ten-year bar. Whether a waiver of that bar is available depends on your qualifying relatives and the hardship your absence would cause them. When there is no direct path currently available If you entered without inspection, you do not have 245(i) eligibility, you do not have a military family connection, and your only option would require leaving the country and triggering an unlawful presence bar — and you do not have qualifying relatives who could support a hardship waiver — then there may not be a straightforward path to a green card right now. That is a hard answer to hear and I give it plainly because the alternative — spending money on an application that does not succeed, or making decisions about leaving the country without understanding the consequences — is worse. Some people in this situation have other options: cancellation of removal if they end up in immigration court, U visa if they have been a victim of a qualifying crime, VAWA if they have been abused by a US citizen or LPR spouse or parent. Those are separate conversations worth having. Why you need an attorney to assess your specific situation The analysis of whether a path exists depends on facts that are specific to your case. When exactly you entered. Whether you have had any prior immigration court proceedings. Whether anyone has ever filed any petition for you. Whether you have any criminal history. Whether you have qualifying family members and what their status is. I have sat across from people who came in and were certain they had no options and found a path they did not know existed. I have also sat across from people who were certain they qualified for something and had to tell them the specific facts of their situation meant they did not. There is no substitute for having someone look at your actual file. A consultation will tell you honestly where you stand and what, if anything, can be done. Call us. Attorney Arzoo Connor ARC Legal Services | Fort Worth, TX | Hablamos Español 469-200-0158 | arclawoffice.com This post is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Every immigration case is different. Please consult a qualified attorney about your individual situation.

ICE can arrest and initiate removal proceedings against a lawful permanent resident.

As of October 23, 2026, there is no path to bond for people who entered the United States without inspection and are detained in Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi.

Someone Showed Me A Will Last Week That They Made With ChatGPT. It Had The Right Words In All The Right Places. It Also Would Have Been Invalid In Texas.

DACA renewals are still being processed as of October 2026

USCIS is using artificial intelligence to screen social media accounts as part of immigration case review

Airports in the United States are federal jurisdiction.